ISRA FACTSHEETS
ISRA FACTSHEETS
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICAN PACIFIC REGION
Arica-Atacama
Summary
Arica-Atacama is located in northern Chile within the Humboldt Current Upwelling System along a 1,200 km stretch of coastline. This area overlaps with an Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Area, the Northern Chile Humboldt Current Upwelling System, which is characterised by a dynamic and highly productive ecosystem. Most of the biological production within the area is restricted to a very narrow continental shelf, where upwellings may occur year-round, even during El Niño conditions. The main habitat encompassed in this area are epipelagic waters. Within the area there are: threatened species (Shortfin Mako Isurus oxyrinchus) and reproductive areas (e.g., Blue Shark Prionace glauca).
Download factsheet
Arica-Atacama
DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT
Arica-Atacama is located in northern Chile within the Humboldt Current Upwelling System along a 1,200 km stretch of coastline. This area partially overlaps with an Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Area (EBSA) known as the Northern Chile Humboldt Current Upwelling System and is situated within the Humboldt Current Large Marine Ecosystem (CBD 2017). The area encompasses the Arica, Iquique, Antofagasta, and Atacama regions of Chile. This upwelling region of northern Chile is recognised as a dynamic and highly productive ecosystem (Alheit and Bernal 1993). One of the prominent features of this area, compared to other eastern boundary currents, is that most of its biological production appears restricted to a very narrow band of continental shelf, within which a coastal upwelling takes place (Fonseca and Farias 1987). This area has received increasing attention in the last decade, motivated by studies indicating that upwellings may occur year-round (Fonseca and Farias 1987). This permanent upwelling produces continuous primary production and secondary production of zooplankton throughout the year (Escribano and McLaren 1999), even under abnormally warm conditions of El Niño (Ulloa et al. 2001).
Because of diminished offshore advection and the presence of retention areas resulting from circulation during upwelling, production and abundance of plankton in the nearshore zone of Antofagasta may be enhanced by plankton remaining aggregated near the shoreline (Escribano and Hidalgo 2000; Marin et al. 2001). Circulation in the nearshore area may exhibit a complex interaction between major currents and variability of winds during upwelling (Marin et al. 2001). Such interaction might give rise to a variety of physical structures near the coast, including the cold-upwelling plumes, highly advective areas, and zones of particle retention (Marin et al. 2001; Giraldo et al. 2002). Together they may act as an efficient mechanism to maintain plankton populations within inshore waters (Marin et al. 2001; Escribano et al. 2002; Giraldo et al. 2002). The additional fertilising effect of large inputs of nutrients from winter runoff and rivers also contributes to year-round productivity (CBD 2017).
This Important Shark and Ray Area is delineated from surface waters to a depth of 40 m in pelagic waters based on the maximum depth range of the habitat used by the Qualifying Species.
CRITERION A
VULNERABILITY
One Qualifying Species considered threatened with extinction according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM regularly occurs in the area. This is the Endangered Shortfin Mako (Rigby et al. 2019).
CRITERION C
SUB-CRITERION C1 – REPRODUCTIVE AREAS
Arica-Atacama is an important reproductive area for two shark species. Within the area, neonate, young-of-the-year, and juvenile Shortfin Mako and Blue Shark are reported (Bustamante and Bennett 2013; Doherty et al. 2014; IFOP 2018, 2019) from fishery-dependent data (catch-per-unit-effort [CPUE] and size-frequency data). Overall, along the coast of Chile, the highest captures (volume), fishing effort, and fishing yields for both species are within this area, and where 95–100% of captures
from these species are juveniles (IFOP 2018, 2019). In 2019, the smallest Blue Shark individual measured 79 cm total length (TL) and 92 cm TL for Shortfin Mako; thus, likely young-of-the-year animals for both species.
Between 2005–2010, 4,202 Blue Sharks (75% juveniles) and 1,748 Shortfin Makos (93% juveniles) were sampled (Doherty et al. 2014). Here, the mean CPUE (sharks/1,000 hook-hours) was 33.2 ± 35.6 SD (range: 0–295; total sets: 618) between March and November, and 3.0 ± 20.7 SD (range: 0–256; total sets: 402) from December to February revealing high seasonality of these catches. The mean size was 130.7 cm TL for Blue Shark and 132.6 cm TL for Shortfin Mako with smaller sizes around the size-at-birth for both species (Doherty et al. 2014). There was a significant effect of depth on Blue Shark and Shortfin Mako CPUE observed in this area with a restricted depth range between 6–12 m (Bustamante and Bennett 2013). This is similar to studies from the eastern North Atlantic (Maia et al. 2007) and northeast Pacific (Sepulveda et al. 2004; Nosal et al. 2019) where immature, including young-of-the-year, Shortfin Mako and Blue Shark mostly occupy the upper 40 m of the water column. In the north of Chile, the upper 30 m of the epipelagic zone is rich in small scombrid and carangid fishes (Alegría 1995; Zuleta 2005) that are a major component of the diets of small-sized Shortfin Makos (López et al. 2009) and Blue Sharks (López et al. 2010).
Similarly, in 2005 and 2010 between January and February, 1,153 Blue Sharks and 1,241 Shortfin Makos were collected from 178 longline sets, with a predominance of small immature sharks (Bustamante and Bennett 2013). Blue Shark and Shortfin Mako were not caught in 23% and 9% of sets, respectively. However, the CPUE (sharks/1,000 hook-hours) ranged from 0–230 for Shortfin Mako and 0–662 for Blue Shark. These values are high compared to similar studies in other regions for these species (Doherty et al. 2014). For example, in Mexican Pacific (Velez-Marin and Marquez-Farias 2009; Smith et al. 2009), and Papua New Guinean (Kumorum 2003) fisheries, less than one shark per 1,000 hook-hours are captured (Bizarro et al. 2009). For Blue Shark, the mean CPUE (sharks/1,000 hook-hours) was 18.4 in the North Atlantic (Campana et al. 2005), 5.5 in Australian waters (Stevens 1992), and 15 in New Zealand waters (Francis et al. 2001). For Shortfin Mako, in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico values oscillated between 3.5 and 11.9 (Cramer 1996) while in the North Atlantic values were between 0.1 and 1.1 (Beerkircher 2005).
Overall, no gravid females were observed for Blue Shark with mature ova found in 8.4% of the female sharks caught (Bustamante and Bennett 2013). For Shortfin Mako, mature ova were found in a single specimen (Bustamante and Bennett 2013). Sex ratio had non-significant deviance from 1:1 for both species. For Shortfin Mako, size of males captured in 2005 presented a mean ± SD of 121.9 ± 23.7 cm TL, while for males was 122 ± 25.4 cm TL. The smallest individual measured 66 cm TL (size-at-birth of Shortfin Mako is 65–70 cm TL; Duffy and Francis 2001; Maia et al. 2007). There was also a predominance of the smaller size classes (70–100 cm TL) in both years for female Shortfin Makos. Sharks between 60 and 70 cm TL are likely to be young-of-the-month, while sharks between 100 and 120 cm TL are likely to be young-of-the-year. For Blue Shark, in 2005, the mean size was 133.1 ± 35.4 TL cm and 152.7 ± 48.6 TL cm for males. In 2010, mean size ranged 139.0 ±27.5 cm TL for females and 151.3 ± 43.3 cm TL for males. The smallest individual measured 52 cm TL (size-at-birth for Blue Shark is 35–60 cm TL; Clarke et al. 2015). Other less recent surveys also assessed the size-frequency of Blue Shark and Shortfin Mako from fisheries off these four political regions between November 2000 and August 2001 and found that most individuals were juveniles with the presence of neonates (Acuña et al. 2001).
Download factsheet
SUBMIT A REQUEST
ISRA SPATIAL LAYER REQUEST
To make a request to download the ISRA Layer in either a GIS compatible Shapefile (.shp) or Google Earth compatible Keyhole Markup Language Zipped file (.kmz) please complete the following form. We will review your request and send the download details to you. We will endeavor to send you the requested files as soon as we can. However, please note that this is not an automated process, and before requests are responded to, they undergo internal review and authorization. As such, requests normally take 5–10 working days to process.
Should you have questions about the data or process, please do not hesitate to contact us.